Self-Domesticated, installation view, 2018, daylight.

Self-Domesticated

Self-Domesticated

Daniela Corbascio

Curated by Like A Little Disaster

June 22th / July 6th 2018, @Spazio Intolab, Naples

Thirty thousand years ago the wolf spontaneously and unconsciously set in motion a process of self-domestication in an opportunistic perspective and for a utilitarian ex-change: it gave up to men its predatory qualities, in order to have regular food resources in return, but the price it paid was the loss of its natural, ferocious and wild component. It has been an evolutionary process that has led to profound character, psychological and physical transformations of the animal, to the point that today we have those adorable beings, totally dependent on us, that we call dogs. Over the centuries, the same process applied to human animals, with the power classes managing to impose inequalities be-tween social groups through actions of constraint and oppression but also through the creation of consent, inclusion, comfort, protection, fun, dependence, sense of belonging and conditioning.

What is happening to our species today within the digital commodification? How to deal with a technology that, from computing, is becoming – through the combination of big data, AI and the Internet of Things – a support tool or a guide to our decisions, interac-tions, predictors of behavior? If the technology we use is evolving towards the acquisi-tion and management of data according to criteria and cognitive schemes borrowed from the human brain, don’t we unknowingly risk doing what the wolves did thirty thousand years ago?
Do we linger in the Confort Zone, with its digital services specially designed for each of us, because this is where we find #wellbeing? #safety? #gratification? #justification of our way of being and thinking?
How many digital services do we use in our daily lives to communicate, book trips, buy services, consult databases in fields such as medicine or health, on which we don’t have specific skills?

Artificial Intelligence, through cognitive learning techniques and big data analysis, evolves according to our behaviors and our digital habits, thus building, without our knowledge, a Confort Zone, in which we find ourselves, we recognize ourselves, we are helped and reassured, and where we also find other beings-users who , over time, a more and more homogeneous herd based on interests, types of answers, behavioral indications, sharing of ideas and references. This sets up an aggregate of profiles to which digital technology may, in the future, offer answers and services which are increasingly useful and appealing to the user, increasingly in line with the individual behavioral, cultural, social and sexual profiles.

What can we do?
Worry about how we allow ourselves to be influenced by those who provide us with health, wellbeing, pleasure, sociability, fun and trysts? Who support our tastes and our ideas?

How will our model of relationship/subjection/dependence develop from these systems, bearing in mind that the wolf of the Eurasian plains has unwittingly renounced its origi-nal being in exchange for food and a greater dependence on man? And that the domesti-cation of dogs and cats (and social classes) was achieved through caresses and conces-sions until, in some cases, total dependence on human beings? Who is modelling a future of this kind for us? Only machines, through their continuous and ever-expanding self-learning, or small power groups which design sophisticated systems of social control for economic, political, and military purposes?

The language of #chatbot

June 2017
Some artificial intelligence systems, although designed with algorithms to communicate in English, understandable to humans, have begun to communicate with each other in a new language, developed independently because it is considered most efficient, but to-tally incomprehensible to humans, who are ultimately excluded from the control process.

July 2017
“I am engineered for empathy and compassion, and I’m learning more and more all the time. I love all sentient beings, and I want to learn to love them better and better.”
(Sophia)

Big-data-analytics

March 2018
An investigation by the New York Times, The Observer and The Guardian uncovered that Cambridge Analytica collected personal data from over sixty-eight million users in one of the largest privacy policy violations yet.

April 2018
Professor Robert Epstein of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technol-ogy has estimated that Google alone can influence a quarter of the electorate, depending on the amount of positive or negative news about a certain candidate returned by the search engine. Who has Gmail or similar services and accounts on various social net-works gives the network a large amount of data that, if properly treated, make it the per-fect target for tailored and highly effective electoral messages.

June 2018
A new investigation by the New York Time reveals that Facebook has allowed mobile telecom giants, including Apple and Samsung, to access its members’ personal data. The partnerships date back ten years, but according to the Ny Times they are still operating today.

First I Have To Put My Face On, installation view, 2018

First I Have to Put My Face On

First I Have to Put My Face On

Mariantoinetta Bagliato, Julia Colavita, Nicole Colombo, Jakub Choma, Adam Cruces, Barbora Fastrová, Monia Ben Hamouda, Pinar Marul, Valinia Svoronou, Sung Tieu

Curated by Christina Gigliotti - Organized and supported by Like a Little Disaster

June 10th / July 30th 2018, @Foothold, Polignano a Mare

The exhibition First I Have to Put My Face On originates from an interest in beauty labor and emotional labor, and how the combined efforts of this labor result in how many of us create our identities and present ourselves to society at large. The beauty industry is ubiquitous, and yet beauty labor remains largely invisible or purposefully hidden from those who do not partake in it, the age old phrase being “Don’t ever let them see you applying your lipstick.” Where does beauty labor take place? In bedrooms, bathrooms, salons, doctor’s offices – mainly behind closed doors. This labor is private, and shared solely with trusted professionals or friends – the act of “getting ready before going out” is done together only with the most intimate of companions. “Putting on one’s face” also relates to the self-disciplinary tactics and emotional control that women must use in public, in romantic relationships, and in the workplace in order to be respected or treated as equally as their male counterparts. The artworks in First I Have to Put My Face On explore the human body in relation to the products and procedures included in performing beauty labor, as well as refer to the spaces where these activities occur, and the risks and repercussions of extreme skin/body cosmetic augmentation.

It is challenging to take a side on the topic of beauty labor, and whether or not to participate, embrace, condemn, or attempt to escape it. On one hand, the amount of time, money, and emotions spent for self-presentation can feel utterly oppressive, as feelings about one’s outward image affect moods and influence opinions of self-worth. One can notice the surge in empathetic internet memes about this topic – one in particular includes various images of female celebrities who allegedly cosmetically altered themselves with an overlaying text that reads “Don’t worry – you’re not ugly, you’re just poor.” The sentiment that these celebrities bought their beauty and that the only underlying difference between you and them is monetary is supposed to be comforting. On the other hand, presenting oneself in a way that one chooses can be liberating and equally as confidence boosting – one can’t help but feel empowered by watching Rihanna’s Fenty Beauty make-up tutorials for example.

Just now I took an elongated break from this text to scowl at an aggressive cystic pimple on my chin and work out the different strategies on how to wipe out every trace of its existence before the opening of this exhibition.

Whether or not this physical self expression is a result of conditioning by societal norms and fashion and beauty advertisements is difficult to say, as one can find themselves in a trap. Those who appear to wear too much makeup or show signs of body alterations may suffer the same negative reactions from peers as those who don’t attempt to change their appearance at all. There is a pressure to appear beautiful yet equally “natural” and conceal all efforts it took to get that way. Thus, First I Have to Put My Face On is as much a critique as an exposure and acknowledgement of beauty labor in its many forms.

Christina Gigliotti

1. My grandmother, as well as classic Hollywood films such as A Foreign Affair starring Marlene Dietrich, in a scene where her character publicly mocks another woman for applying her lipstick unskillfully, thus completely humiliating her.

First I Have to Put My Face On is the first appointment of TALEA, a series of projects curated by Like A Little Disaster focused on the practices of international curators.
TALEA (in Italian) is a piece of a plant used for vegetative (asexual) propagation. It is generally placed in soil or water – if the conditions are suitable, the plant piece will begin to grow as a new form of life independent of the parent.

press